Introduction
The word Peacock deriving from Sanskrit word means " a creature with thousand eyes " .Peahen is considered as the female of peacock .
The peacock is the most beautiful creature among the birds .
You can have a visual look at the peacock which is shown in below figure .
Features of peacock
By looking at the peacock , we at the first look , come to know about its feathers , neck and crest .Let us know each of the above feature in detail .
In peacock , we can see a tail of feathers looking nicely .
Each feather completes in an eye shaped .
The neck of the peacock generally found to be a long one .
The color of the neck naturally seems to be blue one .
The crest of the peacock obviously looks like a fan liked structure .
You can depict the crest ,feathers , neck clearly having a look at below snap .
Case Studies of peacock
The Divine God " Lord Krishna " had a peacock feather on his head and on his seat .The Divine God Lord Shiva 's son " Lord Subramanya Swami " used peacock as his vehicle .
Conclusion
Finally , I conclude that we should preserve our national bird peacock which are going to be ( may ) rarely available in future .
Razia Bibi was a resident of the village Gobramari, under the Canning police station in South 24-Parganas, West Bengal and Moulana Mohiuddin Sardar was a resident of the nearby village Moukhali, under the same police station. As a professional moulabi, Mohiuddin had to stay in the village Palta, in the district of Nadia, under the police station Dhubulia. For a few years, he worked also as a teacher in a madrasa in the Karajgram village, under the Police Station Katwa, in the district of Bardhaman. Last year, he had to go to Gobramari to conduct the eId prayer as the Imam and to put up with the family of Razia Bibi and thus came in close and sexual contact with Razia Bibi.
ReplyDelete13 December 2008 will be the seventh anniversary of our Parliament Attack. The dreaded Islamic terrorist Mohammed Afzal Guru has not been hanged yet despite the Supreme Court's verdict of sending him to the gallows. The present UPA government, in sheer contempt for the Supreme Court, has refused to hang him.
ReplyDeleteIn the meantime, the grief stricken families of the great martyrs have returned the gold medals to the government and this shameless government has kept those medals with it, without showing any remorse, but showing scant regards to those people. It is outrageous that this UPA has insulted the families of their own saviors!
The lack of will and the impotency of this government have led to enormous escalation of Islamic terrorism, which has reduced this nation to the level of Iraq, Ahghanistan and Pakistan.
In the aftermath of the Mumbai attack in which we have lost hundreds of our brothers, sisters and children, it is our responsibility to remind this impotent government and put pressure on it to do its duty of honouring the Supreme Court's verdict.
Hence, we, a group of citizens, have decided to submit a petition to the Honourable President of India to direct the UPA government, in her capacity as the Head of the State, to carry out the punishment for Afzal Guru by honouring the Supreme Court's verdict.
Arrangements have been made to go, along with the families of the martyrs, to meet the President in person and handover this petition, exactly on the 12th of December. We just have nine days to collect as much signatures as possible. Therefore, we request you all to kindly sign this petition and forward it to all your contacts, so that, we can make the government hear the "voice of the citizens".
When the news came to surface, the villagers of the Gobarmari and the family members of Razia Bibi forced Mohiuddin to marry Razia under allegation that he had made Razia pregnant. Later on, it came out that the allegation was not true. The development made Mohiuddin angry. He was also not satisfied with the marriage as the complexion of Razia was dark and she was of delicate health. The developments, especially the false allegation of pregnancy that compelled him to marry Razia pregnant, made Mohiuddin furious. On October 18, Mohiuddin went to his father-in-law’s house and on the pretext of a short visit to Dhubulia, he took Razia to Karajgram, a comparatively lonely place suitable for committing a crime.
ReplyDeleteThere he and Razia put up at a lodge and at night he suffocated Razia to death with her scarf and then tried to behead her with a kitchen knife, he collected at the Howrah railway station by ten rupees. But he found the knife inadequate for the job. To become doubtless about her death, he then tore the head from the body by placing a foot on Razia’s chest. The next day, on 23rd October, police discovered the dead-body of Razia, body and head completely severed, beside a canal in Karajgram.
Mohiuddin, after committing the crime, returned to Kolkata and then to Canning and took shelter in a lodge. The Canning police, at night, went to that lodge to investigate another case, entered the room of Mohiuddin by mistake, when Mohiuddin cried out, “I have committed a mistake. Please leave me. I shall not commit such a mistake again.” The police then took him to the Canning police station and could know the episode after interrogating Mohiuddin. Then the Katwa police was informed and a force from Katwa came to Canning to arrest Mohiuddin.
Under police interrogation, Mohiuddin confessed that on 22nd October, he set out from Gobramari with Razia and roamed the entire day on the streets of Kolkata. In the evening they boarded a Katwa local at Howrah railway station and reached Katwa at night. Then they walked 15 kilometres to reach the Mouli Setu near Karajgram. Interrogation further revealed that Mhiuddin at first strangled Razia with her scarf and then he tried to sever her head with the kitchen knife. But failing to do so, with the fragile kitchen knife, he finally put his left foot on Razia’s chest, caught hold of her hair and tore the head off from her body.
There are a few points to notice in the above incident. It was not difficult for Mohiuddin to get rid of Razia. Firstly, he could easily divorce Razia by pronouncing triple talaq. Secondly, he could also marry a second wife of his choice as, according to Shariah law, he could have kept four wives at a time. So it seems that a brutal murder, as mentioned above, was not essential. One has, therefore, to conclude that Mohiuddin resorted to the above cruelty only to avenge the wrong done to him by forcing him to marry Razia on a false allegation.
ReplyDeleteIt is more necessary to investigate why only Muslims are seen to commit such horrible acts of brutality? The present author is fully convinced that it is the creed of Islam that inspires the Muslims to commit such horrid acts of violence. Islam has originated in Arabia where, still today, pastoral life-style persists. Its semi-desert character of land and paucity of rail fall have compelled it remain in the pastoral stage of human civilization and arrested its advancement into an agricultural one, the next higher stage of human civilization.
For an individual in a pastoral society, meat is a staple food and hence killing animals and letting blood is a daily routine matter. This pastoral cruelty is overwhelmingly reflected in the Koran, where Allah asks the Muslims to mount such cruelties on the kafirs. Moreover, Allah himself scares the kafirs with various types of extremely cruel punishments in hell. As a follow up, one finds the Muslim rulers in India resorted to punish the kafirs with horribly cruel acts during the Muslim rule that continued for nearly 700 years in this country. One may recall that by the order of Aurangzib, three disciples of Guru Govind Singh were murdered with extreme cruelty. Bhai Moti Dass was sawed alive like a log, Bhai Dyala was boiled alive and another disciple was burnt alive. Firstly he was wrapped with cotton and linen, soaked the cotton with oil and then setting it to fire.
It was a normal practice for the Muslim rulers to kill the kafirs, arrested for any pretext, with extraordinary cruelty. Smashing the head under the foot of an elephant, or under a heavy log, tearing the limbs apart by pulling them by elephants etc. were very common as well as amusing to those barbaric rulers. There were people who could invent newer kind of cruelties like flaying a child in front of a mother, flaying the husband in front of his wife and force her eat the flesh of her husband, cutting a child into pieces on his or her mother’s lap and so on.
ReplyDeleteThe Prophet Mohammad, in his life time, had taught his followers many such pastoral brutalities and it will be relevant to narrate one of them in the present context. In one occasion eight people, belonging to the Ukl clan, came to Medina and embraced Islam and hence became very dear to Mohammad. But the climate of Medina did not suit them and hence they fell ill. Mohammad prescribed camel-milk as food and camel-urine as medicine for the recovery and hence they were shifted to stable of camels. Within a short time, they recovered from their illness. But after that they committed an unpardonable crime. They murdered the stable keeper, fled with the camels and deserted Islam. They were soon captured by Mohammad’s men and brought to Medina .
They committed three very serious crimes. Firstly, they murdered the stable keeper. Secondly, they stole the camels of the stable. And thirdly, they abandoned Islam. The first and the third crime deserved death sentence, while the second crime was enough to chop their right hands off. Mohammad decided to punish them with exemplary punishments and that too by his own hands. He took two iron rods, made them red hot and then pushed the rods into the eyes of the victims. Then he chopped the limbs of the victims off and kept them lying on the hot sand under mid-day sun with the faces up. Within a couple of hours, all the eight victims died. If the Prophet could have exhibited such examples of cruelty, what can one expect from his followers? The most important part of the episode is that, Muslims around the world quickly pick up this pastoral cruelty, after conversion to Islam, through Koran and Hadiths, and the teachings of the Imams of the mosques. And it is needless to say that Islam has instilled the said pastoral cruelty into Mohiuddin of Moukhali village in West Bengal .